- Home
- Relationships
- Divorce
- Dispelling Some Myths about Divorce Petition, Adultery and Division of Assets
Dispelling Some Myths about Divorce Petition, Adultery and Division of Assets
- By Thomas Griffiths
- Published 12/20/2007
- Divorce
- Unrated
Thomas Griffiths
Thomas A. Griffiths, a qualified family law solicitor. Additional information about family law services is available at Mcaras Solicitors website.
View all articles by Thomas GriffithsA common myth exists that parties have to wait two years before they can Petition for divorce. This is incorrect. As long as you have been married a year you can generally Petition immediately. The most common “fact” on which most people rely is their spouses unreasonable behaviour. When the marriage is working the other parties inevitable and irritating habits become “the facts” of unreasonable behaviour when the marriage breaks down.
(a) you cannot have a fully binding final Order agreement with regard to matrimonial finances unless there has been a divorce;
(b) no Pension Sharing Order can be made without there having been a divorce;
(c) more generally if the marriage has broken down, it is better to start the process off than leave it as unfinished business.
(a) your spouse has committed adultery and you find it intolerable to live with them;
(b) your spouse has behaved in such a manner that you cannot reasonably be expected to live with them;
(c) you have lived apart for two years and you both agree to there being a divorce;
(d) there has been desertion for a period of more than two years;
(e) you have lived apart for five years. Although you have to prove one of the five “facts”, it is much easier to prove b to e than a. Husbands and wifes will agree to all kinds of unreasonable behaviour but they frequently baulk at adultery even when it is quite clear that adultery has taken place.
Factors such as children being able to continue to attend the same schools, maintain their same friendships and have the benefit of family and other support in the locality are important. However, the main deciding factor will be the financial viability of retaining the house, balanced against the other parents need to obtain appropriate accommodation to enable the children to stay weekends, holidays etc, particularly if its possible for there to be shared care arrangement.
It is a useful exercise to look at alternative accommodation within the same locality, or one adjacent where housing prices may be a little lower. The internet sites for local Estate Agents are a convenient way to research this and its also necessary to look at each parties potential borrowing capacity for a mortgage but more importantly the afford ability of paying back any money borrowed.Some Lenders will take Tax Credits into consideration and others will also base mortgage ability upon payments of child support, particularly if these can be confirmed in a Court Order because they are being made by Consent.
To succeed in an argument to either retain a property or
from another perspective to persuade a Court that a property needs to be sold
to release equity to both parents to rehouse are areas divorce solicitors are
very familiar with and can advise you upon further.
Bob Wilkins is a <a
href="http://www.getdivorced.co.uk">matrimonial specialist</a>
at Mcaras Solicitors,

